Fan Brycheiniog Waypoints
Here’s a few useful grid refs from the waypoints I marked on
my Fan Brycheiniog walk. They include a few summits and the
locations of a few aircraft wrecks. Since EGNOS is now active
these grid refs are surprisingly accurate when reception is
good. On open high ground these days I typically get an EPE of
1m-3m, usually 2m. Most averaged waypoints have an EPE
(estimated position error) of between 1.5m and 2m. Comparisons
with accurate grid refs show these estimates to be pretty
reliable.
The Pre-Amble
For those who aren’t familiar with how I do it, here’s an
explanation. You can skip this bit if you already know or don’t
really care. But I’ll point it out here for future
reference.
When I record a grid ref I typically mark two waypoints,
first a normal waypoint, then an averaged one. I rarely average
for very long, usually only for about a minute, although
sometimes longer if it’s an important grid ref, when I may stop
for a while to rest, have a snack or take some photos.
Because my averages are usually quite short there may seem
little point in recording them, but there are two good reasons.
The first is to cancel out any spurious errors which can happen
for a brief moment when contact is acquired or lost on a
particular satellite, or due to the momentum factor immediately
after stopping. The second is that the averaged waypoint
records the GPS altitude, whereas the normal waypoint records
the altimeter altitude (I have a GPS with a built in
altimeter). So I need to do mark both types of waypoint to
record both altitude readings.
Now that EGNOS is finally working, the accuracy is typically
so good when there are no obstructions that the averaged
waypoint is rarely more than 1m different to the normal
waypoint, so there’s little need to record an averaged
waypoint, unless you want to record the GPS altitude. For the
grid refs listed below, I’ll choose the averaged waypoint in
preference to the normal waypoint.
GPS altitude is less accurate though, usually x1.5 the
horizontal error, so an EPE of 2m would give an altitude EPE of
3m. As for the altimeter accuracy, this depends on the weather
conditions and on the GPS auto-calibration. As a result, the
altimeter can sometimes be more accurate than the GPS altitude
(typically in calm conditions), sometimes less accurate
(typically in windy conditions).
To start with, I’ll just mention the waypoints I recorded at
my car at the beginning and end of the walk. This is not to
demonstrate absolute accuracy, but relative accuracy. I’ve
included the high definition grid ref in brackets (GPS Utility
is capable of showing this level of precision, which many GPS
units record, but don’t actually display).
CAR1 SN 84576 16460 (SN 84576.00 16460.07) 208.0m
CAR2 SN 84576 16459 (SN 84575.64 16459.15) 208.0m
Note that the easting is identical and the northing is only
1m different. The high precision figures show the difference to
be less than 1m. Also the altitude is identical, even to 1
decimal place. This is quite remarkable after a difference of 7
hours! Of course, such pairs of waypoints aren’t always this
accurate, but it’s impressive none the less. It does help to
inspire confidence in the level of accuracy that EGNOS
provides.
Note that I mark all waypoints in a normal standing
position, or on top of trig points, so I have to subtract one
metre for the correct altitude. In this case that would make it
207m. If you check the grid ref against the 25k scale map,
you’ll find that it’s roughly 7/10ths of the way between the
200m and 210m contours, pretty much exactly where you’d expect
207m to be in fact.
Having said that, I don’t usually get this level of accuracy
from the altitude. On most of my walks the altitude tends to
start too high. (I always calibrate the altitude at a known
height at home before leaving, thus allowing plenty of time for
the auto-calibration to take effect before starting the
walk.)
I’ll subtract the 1m before listing the altitudes below.
The Grid References
Allt Fach 463m - SN 84150 17867
GPS altitude 464m (+1m), altimeter altitude 466m (+3m)
Fan Hir 761m - 83092 20928
GPS 763m (+2m), altimeter 770m (+9m)
Fan Brycheiniog / Fan Hir Col (height uncertain) - SN 82889
21301
GPS 720m, altimeter 718m
Fan Brycheiniog 802m - SN 82534 21798
GPS 807m (+5m), altimeter 806m (+4m)
Fan Brycheiniog Shelter (height uncertain) - SN 82552
21771
GPS 804m, altimeter 805m
Fan Brycheiniog Trig Point
This is worthy of more detail. The non-anally-retentive can
ignore this bit.
Since this is a trig point I have an accurate grid ref
supplied by the Ordnance Survey themselves. I have this in two
formats, OSGB and WGS84. The OSGB grid ref is SN 82533 21792
and is the correct map format. The WGS84-lat/long format is the
internal format used by GPS units and is
N51.882288,W003.708040.
You’ll notice that the grid ref I recorded is inaccurate by
6m compared to the OSGB grid ref. However, most of that
inaccuracy is due to the simple (and inaccurate) datum
transformation that takes place in the GPS itself. Most
commercially available GPS/mapping software (such as
OziExplorer, GPS Utility, Memory Map, Anquet etc.) uses a
similarly simple transformation.
The accurate transformation requires a complex formula.
There is a free program available from the Ordnance Survey
website which will accomplish this, but for most purposes it
isn’t necessary.
The important thing is that the WGS84 grid ref is accurate,
which is what GPS units use internally, irrespective of what
datum and format the unit displays. Inputting the WGS84 grid
ref, then converting it with software, will give pretty much
the same result as the GPS unit does. This provides a far more
accurate comparison.
Converting the WGS84 grid ref with GPS Utility in high
precision mode (the most accurate “simple” conversion) gives a
grid ref of SN 82535.73 21797.39, which rounds to SN 82536
21798. Compare this to my averaged EGNOS reading:
SN 82536 21798 - GPS Utility Conversion
SN 82534 21798 - GPS with EGNOS, averaged over about 5 minutes,
EPE 1.7m.
As you can see, my recorded waypoint is only 2m different,
consistent with the estimated position error. Pretty damn good
I’d say!
In fact, I recorded another GPS waypoint and also took two
photographs of my GPS on top of the trig point showing
different readings. Averaging the three gives:
SN 82535 21798 - only 1m different! Even better!
One of the three photos actually shows SN 82536 21798, the
precise grid ref (simple transformation). I could have just
shown you that photo, but I didn’t want to imply greater
accuracy than actually exists. (Update: I’ve now added that
photo to the top of this post.)
None of the two waypoints I recorded and two photos I took
were more than 2m out, so whilst I’d love to boast of sub-1m
accuracy, we’re not quite there yet. But we’re not far off!
EGNOS still has farther to go! [:-)]
The Aircraft Wrecks
The vampire wreck is quite easy to find, not far from the
head of the river Haffes, it can be seen from about 500m away.
The main wreckage is collected in one spot, but there’s also a
second spot in a stream a short distance to the north-east. I
also found some extra bits in a stream a bit further south. I’m
not sure if the latter are commonly known.
VAMPIRE1 SN 82653 20042 604m This is the main wreckage
VAMPIRE2 SN 82703 20095 613m
VAMPIRE3 SN 82660 19894 599m
Further SSE, and much more difficult to find without a grid
ref, are the very sparse remains of a Wellington bomber. I’ve
also marked the small memorial cairn, which is much easier to
see from a distance, although the wreckage itself isn’t, even
from the cairn.
WELLINGTON SN 83251 18382 534m
MEM-CAIRN SN 83261 18389 538m
The Permissive Path
Finally, the permissive path which I didn’t know about,
which I only discovered as a result of doing this walk. It’s a
much gentler ascent to, and descent from, the Fan Hir ridge
than the more well known one from Tafarn-y-Garreg, which passes
Ty Hendrey farm. I’ve marked the stile at the top and at the
bottom. The path is well-marked between these two
waypoints.
SN 84032 17254 Top Stile
SN 84265 16745 Bottom Stile
Posted on 2007 05 31
|